To the Center of Science and Culture Discovery Institute-to the honorary Stephen Meyer

11-09-2014
My thinking was never so much to believe a alligator nor a whale or what at one time or vice versus or that here humans come from that. It never seemed like anything to do with science to believe that an alligator is here my superior. Anyway forgive my running on and. As I am someone, that likes to write from head to page, and do in a fashioned way that takes me only an 3hrs. or so, for a letter like this. Which allows me to harass more people a day.
But great job on you; not for so much deconstructing evolution heads, but more just being a validating voice for those of us who are not in an connected ease to the brain trusts of evolution. You speak to those that try to here nudge me out of my brain capacity. I am really sick of the illicit intellectual tree shaker apes that only want their --- selective reasoning defining the rest of us- for what others of theirs harassing others like me for my thinking free of them. Because discovery is something that is supposed to go hand and hand, where everyone of the degree and non-degree of college thinking should have a shot at what is forwarded as theory about, to decide amongst one another- and not get our definitions as willed to us- by some observed spot on the sun that calls itself the one group that calls itself science as being our science.
When this sun is pretty big. And we should not be defined by just one spot, or one banana they think is valid.
What is my directive reason for writing you? For one, I think that you are pretty damn cool for what you do. You are a very devout thinker and not just that, it is that you have a mind that thinks on the run better than most. Someone really as dedicated to what type of words that come out of your mouth, in contain of the scene there. Meaning: “you don't go beyond what is written,” like the old Hebrew saying says to the wise as willing to hear. I never seen you non-eloquent, except when what interviewer Dan was trying to direct a mob stir in try to discolor your argument- before anything came out of your mouth, like in Daniel Abrams hit job with Eugenia Scott there coming along for the ride, you cannot help that Daniel is really a devout emptied head who subscribes too much too falsifying.
He divulges honesty as something as waste under his feet.
Myself am not a scientist: nor at least not by the definition what evolution exudes upon, for those of us who are not so contained by their logic circle. As parameters there make a decision to say that someone needs first most utter accreditation, needs to come from going to college, and once out of college? “science monopolizers got to tag you a scientist” for fatal complete to happen, “you are a scientist.” I have never much understood that kind of ordained sequence, that rudimentary feature a slave driver uses-- to a never let science untangle from that web, until their spider eats dissenting opinion. I am sorry I just got done watching one of your debates on you tube, here.
As really I am about your age and really it is too late for me- to go to college and get myself as collected among-degrees of knowledge. As I thank the Lord above that he put huge stumbling blocks ahead of me- to----keep me from any type of college, for otherwise then time would have lent me to be in a time wasted; for my time my here then trying to figure out what my life is as a Atheist I would have turned off my brain and become evolutionary there.
I might have avoided Christianity. Who knows in my speculation?
Which brings me now to the same place you are in, when trying to bring Intelligent Design into the evolutionists world.
The simple waywardness of what their composite ease is for-- what leaks into a lack of not wanting any real truth here. I cannot recover myself in their conceived truth, because there is no total one corporeal uniformed body of people, but they are all separate but saying the same thing. And we are all human beings as human but apes do rule.
Apes don't want truth to happen now, because that would mean they would have to be an actual scientist now, singular.
They only love the title of being comfortable and throwing their responsibility onto future there inhabitants after. So they can keep their vestige sound and tight wrapped in the presence of theirs, because they only have their knowledge banana. Inevitably puts science into a waiting mode; everyone's got to wait for bumble to come up to date in thought.
Anyway, Stephen Meyer,
Accept my learned thought as I am not from any college nor from a category case number nor demon (mind evil). I am 'the not yet evolved demonstrative' who yet my greatest accomplishment, was to get out of school a no matter a graduate from  college or high school but to- just so to get away from the pen dict mind kill thrillers. Hated college and high school for most of its so called great mind captors that only podded thought. Now my life is languished in dead end job heaven. No hope really to get on the circuit that wants to hear me talk. Because I really have nothing to say to anyone.
But the good Lord will want me there eventually saying my nothing.  
As I watched one of your debate videos. But actually you inspired me to do something that is far gone really against my nature. Because there are already too many at chasing one and others tales out for about along with their own tail. The exactness of what their discovery at least: it comes to better something of nothing in matter?
I belittle myself in that more than anyone, because I want to be one of you guys now.I want to better nothing but everything in matter. 
You represent your science well. I don't know if my science is relevant or enough to be accepted because I am just a mind scientist (not psychologist or psychiatrist or brain surgeon) but a person in study of human articulated feature. I am not a chemist or biologist or bacteriologist or metaphysical phenom with great ideas on physics as a Max Born philosophy, nor anything so much in Quantum theory nor Einstein's greater thermal dynamic, no I am; because I am. But I love all English literary and science study venues that show what a true on power.
For every bit of one's relevance to this earth, for mannerism in subjective of our being- there listening to one of your lectures always leaves me with an open ended result to your conclusion, which to me is a good thing for life standard.
That would be the extent of what I could say, as a high school drop-out, to kids or adults looking to grasp my intellect. I still feel: even as someone living in poverty, better off for not going to college and for my becoming myself. Nor someone that had some else pay my scholarship- for what a--college degree does bring.
Shit, I got smart by not going to college and saved myself or someone else thousands of dollars.
I love all my Christian and non-Christians in our field, assuming you are a Christian; but us Intelligent Design folks need not be Christian to have a view for intelligent design or evolution. I as a Christian at one time fell into the evolution process of determined thought: as far as how things like plants and stuff came to be- there. I was never for my coming from fish or apes or primordial swamp gas or coming from the eternal hydrogen bubble of assort.
But I thought that evolution had a case in things; until I discovered what their great Natural Selection process is really.
I didn't follow the yellow brick road. I know that dude or chick behind the science iron curtain has less brains in his or her body than I have in my pinky. I like that I am the person who is the low of the low brained, making the wise of the world foolish.
Anyway, good job. And I enjoyed watching one of your debates today. It got me riled up, Stephen. Hey! If you could go read a blog of mine- as I am someone who is really a first type of person in my field of study: that will have put- together an actual literary work on 9/11. Which would be really interesting to have a debate on 9/11 with evolutionists, for myself- and just among literates in general from science, English, History, etc place of life here. Writers 50 years ago, with what the quality that was out there- say like an H.L. Mencken, if he had seen 911, who was an---- agnostic or Atheist. But he would even have to agree that the equivalent amount of intelligence that it took people there to believe in a military industrial complex's presented science for how 9/11 and the Towers, it would have been timeless stupidity that all went down in the USA. Because I have never met an evolutionist willing to stay inside the science for how metal melts and buildings come down, and explain to me- how all laws of physics and metallurgy have to be thrown out for their case of 9/11. No writer with writing ability like a Mencken  has he come out, and really purged out this crime.
Mine strength is literary piecing, not only just referencing and topical fact checking; no I get into comprehension usage of English. Also I have another blog that I am dedicating to Evolution Versus Intelligent Design. 
And will probably come up with a fiction book out of that. Anyway I could really bring an English literal scale for either side of this type issue that has not been really been pursued before, no matter what the subject people need a writer on, vehemently. As there are a lot of junk head evolutionists out there allowed into the community. Why not establish a side of argument that comes from the Literary ID thought base? I don't see the mastery for how this subject being pursued from like say a C.S. Lewis used to relay Christianity through his fictional books. That is something for conceiving ritual that could be accomplished in support of ID, really; whether in short letter or poem style or short story or narrative novel or however comical or serious or mysterious.
So God has me as the modern H.L. Mencken about, but this time HL is an MJ and this Young, and this Michael James Young is a Christian. Give both my blogs a look, and see if I could be of help in anyway.
Stephen, give my unfinished book a look. I am debating to leave it- as just a writing piece or create it into a book. Because I am probably eventually by God --'the old one' am going to be doing the lecture circuit myself; by divine will soon enough for mystical range. But only as a writer, nothing smart. But that is maybe up for concerns. I hate posing as something smarter than my actual self; just because I have a pertaining gift of seeing....
A hick at heart or a slum born type child of poverty street driven mad sordid, who grew-up in among natural surroundings. I feel I am needed. A trailer trash vagrant who hangs out at trailer parks, looking for natural process. As I was wishing that Christopher Hitchens would live to defeat cancer, because my low brow drawn empty pocket minded education; in usury of my slipshod ethic would have loved a shot at the pied stool.
Because Chris was one of mind sort, he should have been a person separated from his person and emotion; I would have as a plebe; me as an impertinent trace in compared to his intellect or an ape's, I would have loved to dissect him. To show him, as one of mine, a mouthful of English. He was treated as some great provincial thinker by those in dirge that calls its self scientific, yet he was not a scientist nor had a science degree. And those evolution scientists accepted his word like it were Darwin's. And yet here are yours and you who are qualified with all your degrees and are of great of ilk in qualifications than most on the evolution side. 
As hey this is a spiritual battle. As I am not college educated, but I am easily acclimated to any intellectual or non-believer or any type of prototype protagonist in front of me. Am handy a writer; computer literate; tireless worker if need be. I am just looking for work in your type of field. Which is most beneficial in regards to saving impressions in America.
The underlying factors being that for my work in study, it has it- that as myself as when as someone more in the range of agnosticism, kind of an Albert Einstein type of mindset on religion- before my becoming a Christian. 
But I was also at times an Atheist in my thinking. But from my living that life I found a greater portion of evolutionists or Natural Selection folks; (they get on us- ID people for not calling ourselves creationists, but evolutionists get to change and hide their intentions). As I have found in dealing with a lot of Satanists in my ministry most of them are evolutionists but now natural selection folks, vice versus, most Atheists are evolutionists who are into Satan lore. Where they don't believe in the Hebrew God, but in a creator in source a divine presence and they hide that. As that is part of their religion is to hide the fact that they have a religion and are very much religious in their presort.
But their power is derived in keeping it a secret. It is very interesting. Get into an argument with Dawkins or who ever and just bring up their culture activity and how would they explain Satanism to folks for its high percent of Atheists? Those type like him- get angry immediately because they and his type take vows in concerning their beliefs. Which really is quite amusing how many so called top notch Atheists that I have gotten in discussion with – where I just bring up Satan flippantly, and it is like they will want to say something to try and refute me in our discussion but won't. For whatever our argument, then the argument becomes over immediately, the Christian wins.
Laugh, it is not a Christian of me- type of trick. But it is like knowing something they know and how much they want to keep it a secret.
It is quite amusing.
Because our religion is open theirs is closed in a deep silence. Hey! I work for pennies on the dollar or free or what. I am a guy in poverty. But am not some fame or money whore, I am a follower of the glorious Lord Jesus Christ.
But I can banter and think mean or good with the best of them. Now that I feel like doing it, nicely. Hey, I live in your neck of the woods in Washington State, in Mukilteo; probably about 25 miles outside of Seattle. Call me- or email me- if you ever need someone to help in someway with your Center for Science and Culture Discovery Institute. I am happy to just volunteer because I really like the work that you guys are doing. It is real honest and integral.
Hey! Thanks again, go to beyondthecairnofmanumit.blogspot.com as I think that I did a pretty good job of free writing. And go further read a poem that I wrote in, deadlivingend.blogspot.com, called- Baseball, Apple pie, and Atheism-an American Funeral. Bring on the new Christopher Hitchens or who else that they have as an anti-christ.
Mike

Baseball, Apple Pie, and Atheism-an American funeral

~ A funeral, but a future for an Atheist~
That is all you got.
Your theory put to the test. Well I still have not anything coming out of that turd spell, and another 100 billion years have went by; nor do I see any human head formulate out of Shamu the whale, and my families 100 billion year Bible company is going along great; giving out all of Stephen Meyer's books on Intelligent Design with all those other non-scientists folks. While Richard Dawkins or Eugenie Scott or Michael Shermers have yet to show a finger grown out of a tree. Though I know that all those cross mutation DNA labs that have been still trying to cross mutate man into animal, to prove that those structures are compatible and they indeed all came from one another. They still claim that they are the greatest science on it all. As all the money went to their discovery and there.
They were all the science for billions of years. With them seeing none of their ancestors come again, out of old birth.
Evolution or Natural Process has looked to have stalled. Meanwhile humans still birth humans, and trees still birth trees, birds still birth birds. And the creative Intelligent Design process of things still goes on- in amongst life.
No, if one has right as their standard and has the key to utter profound discernment to do with science, but then you would have then everything to live for as an Atheist. Atheists telling me that they have everything to live for on earth for their fact they go into devoid matter. Because they go into nothing again, to that great mosh posh of ever regenerating soup mix of life and creation, and them to be seen again in ---another 100 billion year cycle. Man, you have the key of life then. So don't ever you Atheists sell yourself short. Do as thou wilt now. You have an eternal hydrogen bubble, the forever primordial gas feature to go back to, the illusory entitlement to what is all your given right, as really nothing is so confounded for when you go back to all of that. I will probably have my future son and daughter visit you down at the Pacific Ocean when you and your cousins swim- if you die before I do.
Or all my children will go down and see your cousins down at the sanitation department: who we have not yet quite seen yours develop thoroughly "who knows?' if you are yet out of the erroneous turd spell. Or maybe when your best friends come out of the ground as a tree, “let's cut you down and make a Bible; more Bibles out of them.” Or I will Intelligently Design an air plane out of you-, let you grace majesty that you have or have not understood or notice to see in your current physical state. I will have to read to you over like this again. What a devout poem to the Atheist, I wrote it in 5 minutes here. I hope that all you Atheists who think you just --- destroy us- illiterate Christians by your brain detachment as you severed all ties to religion but adjoin in death to all us as creation.
Evidently for understanding the key of life, you have come to the point of losing your intelligence again. Or you gain so much for being so much in confused intelligence again. As who knows what you formulate into now there. All that for you being the sure right. The sure understanding. The sure pursuit. You become mixed up all again. The utter irreverence that comes to finding and being the utter true truth and righteous understanding of things.
This all going back to a big bang.
M.J. “The Rooster” Young or just call me Mike